🚢⛓️🧑🏿‍🦱👁️⚖️✝️ A History of Slavery: John Newton (Amazing Grace)

I. A Breakdown on the History of Slavery in Europe

Historians usually measure the most prolific nations in the transatlantic slave trade by the number of Africans transported and the scale of involvement.


6. Denmark-Norway

  • Period of prominence: 18th century
  • Region of activity: West Africa, Caribbean (especially the Danish West Indies – modern U.S. Virgin Islands)
  • Scale: Smaller in comparison (~100,000–150,000 Africans)
  • Notable: First European nation to ban the slave trade in 1803.

5. The Netherlands (Dutch)

  • Period of prominence: 17th century
  • Region of activity: West Africa, Caribbean, Suriname
  • Scale: Transported around 500,000–600,000 Africans.
  • Notable: Dutch West India Company was a major player in the trade, particularly to Suriname and the Caribbean islands.

4. Spain

  • Period of prominence: 16th–19th centuries
  • Region of activity: Caribbean, Central and South America (Cuba, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Colombia)
  • Scale: Transported over 1 million Africans, though Spain often outsourced transport to Portuguese and other European traders.
  • Notable: Spain was slower to develop its own merchant fleet but heavily relied on enslaved labor in colonies.

3. France

  • Period of prominence: 17th–18th centuries
  • Region of activity: West Africa, Caribbean (notably Haiti/Saint-Domingue), Louisiana
  • Scale: Transported roughly 1.25–1.5 million Africans.
  • Notable: French Caribbean colonies were heavily reliant on slave labor, especially for sugar plantations.

2. Britain

  • Period of prominence: Late 16th century – 1807 (slave trade), 1833 (slavery abolished in colonies)
  • Region of activity: West Africa, Caribbean, North America
  • Scale: Transported approximately 3 million Africans.
  • Notable: British ships dominated the triangular trade between England, Africa, and the Americas; cities like Liverpool, Bristol, and London became wealthy from it.

1. Portugal

  • Period of prominence: 15th–19th centuries
  • Region of activity: West Africa, Brazil, Caribbean
  • Significance: First European nation to engage systematically in the African slave trade (from the 1440s onward).
  • Scale: Transported roughly 4–5 million Africans to the Americas.
  • Notable: Portugal controlled early trade routes to Brazil, making Brazil the largest single destination for enslaved Africans.

Summary Table

NationPeriodEstimated Africans TransportedNotable Regions
Portugal15th–19th c.4–5 millionBrazil, Caribbean
Britain16th–19th c.3 millionCaribbean, N. America
France17th–18th c.1.25–1.5 millionCaribbean, Louisiana
Spain16th–19th c.~1 millionCaribbean, S. America
Netherlands17th c.0.5–0.6 millionSuriname, Caribbean
Denmark-Norway18th c.0.1–0.15 millionDanish West Indies

💡 Observation: Portugal and Britain were by far the most prolific. France, Spain, and the Netherlands played significant but smaller roles, often focused on specific colonies.


II. Slavery in Britain

Slavery in Britain has a long and complex history, but it’s important to distinguish between slavery on British soil versus Britain’s involvement in the transatlantic slave trade.

  1. Early Medieval Period (Anglo-Saxon England, c. 5th–11th centuries)
    • Slavery existed in Britain well before the modern era. Anglo-Saxons practiced chattel slavery, capturing or buying people from raids or markets.
    • Slaves (called thralls) were used in households, farms, and even on royal estates.
  2. Norman and Late Medieval Periods (11th–15th centuries)
    • After the Norman Conquest (1066), slavery declined in England and gradually gave way to serfdom, where peasants were bound to land but not bought and sold as property.
    • By the 12th–13th centuries, true chattel slavery largely disappeared in England itself.
  3. Early Modern Period / Transatlantic Slave Trade (16th–19th centuries)
    • Britain became heavily involved in the Atlantic slave trade starting in the late 16th century, transporting enslaved Africans to colonies in the Americas.
    • This is when Britain’s economy became deeply entwined with slavery, though it was primarily overseas rather than domestic.
  4. Abolition
  • Slavery in British colonies was abolished in 1833 with the Slavery Abolition Act, and the slave trade itself had been outlawed in 1807.
  • England itself had no legal slavery after the Somerset case (1772), in which Lord Mansfield ruled that slavery was unsupported by English law.

Summary:

  • Slavery existed in Britain from at least the Anglo-Saxon period (5th century) through the medieval period.
  • True chattel slavery in England declined by the 12th–13th centuries.
  • Britain’s role in the transatlantic slave trade began in the late 1500s and continued until the early 19th century.

III. Comparing Slavery in Europe to America

When comparing the transatlantic slave trade conducted by European nations with the United States’ involvement in slavery, it’s important to note that the U.S. became a major site of slavery rather than a major transporter, though it participated in both domestic and international aspects.


1. Timeframe

Europe (Major traders)America (U.S.)
Portugal: 1440s–1800sSlavery in U.S.: c. 1619–1865
Britain: late 1500s–1807Importation of slaves banned 1808, but domestic slavery continued
France: 17th–18th c.Peak plantation slavery in South: 18th–mid-19th c.
Spain: 16th–19th c.Spain influenced territories (e.g., Florida, Louisiana) before U.S. acquisition
Netherlands: 17th c.Minor direct role; some Dutch traders operated in colonies that became U.S. territory

Observation: Europe was primarily a transporter; America was primarily a destination and site of domestic enslavement.


2. Role in the Slave Trade

EuropeAmerica (U.S.)
Captured or purchased Africans from West Africa and transported them to colonies worldwide.Imported some Africans directly (mostly early, before 1808), but relied heavily on the domestic slave trade from older southern states to newer territories.
Shipping and trading were core economic activities.Slavery was integrated into agriculture (cotton, tobacco, rice, sugar) and domestic economy.

3. Scale

EuropeAmerica (U.S.)
Britain: ~3 million Africans transportedU.S.: ~400,000–600,000 Africans imported legally (1619–1808), but domestic population grew to ~4 million enslaved by 1860 due to natural increase.
Portugal: 4–5 million, mostly to BrazilU.S.: Smaller importer compared to European nations, but very high mortality and birth rates sustained population.

Observation: Europe dominated transport; the U.S. grew its enslaved population primarily internally.


EuropeAmerica (U.S.)
Trade regulated by European monarchs and chartered companies; illegal trade was prosecuted after bans (Britain 1807, Portugal 1836).Slavery codified in state and federal law, deeply embedded in society, economy, and politics; abolition required civil war (1861–1865).
Abolition often driven by economic and moral arguments in Europe.Abolition was highly contested; required constitutional amendment (13th Amendment) after war.

5. Economic Dependence

EuropeAmerica (U.S.)
Wealth built on shipping, trading, and colonial commodities (sugar, tobacco, cotton).Wealth built on plantation agriculture in the South; economy heavily dependent on enslaved labor.
Some European nations profited without having large enslaved populations at home.U.S. South’s economy was domestically reliant on maintaining and reproducing the enslaved population.

Summary of Key Differences and Similarities

Differences:

  • Europe: Primarily transporters; small domestic slave populations; abolition mostly legislative.
  • America: Primarily consumers/owners; large domestic enslaved population; abolition required war.

Similarities:

  • Both systems depended on racialized, forced labor.
  • Both profited enormously from the system.
  • Both had legal frameworks that enforced slavery.

💡 Insight: While European nations fueled the transatlantic trade, the U.S. developed a self-sustaining enslaved population that became a central social, political, and economic institution—making the American experience more internally entrenched than the European trade model.


IV. Slavery Among the Founding Fathers

When examining the Founding Fathers of the United States, it’s important to distinguish between:

  1. Direct involvement in the slave trade (buying, selling, or transporting enslaved people as a business).
  2. Slave ownership (owning enslaved people personally or on plantations).

1. Slave Traders

  • There is no evidence that any major Founding Father ran large-scale slave trading operations like the European traders.
  • Some may have profited indirectly through inheritance or investments connected to trade, but active slave trading was uncommon among them.

2. Slave Owners

Many of the most prominent Founding Fathers owned enslaved people, particularly those from southern states:

NameStateNotes on Slavery
George WashingtonVirginiaOwned hundreds; eventually freed his slaves in his will.
Thomas JeffersonVirginiaOwned ~600 over his lifetime; never freed most; involved in agricultural slave economy.
James MadisonVirginiaOwned enslaved people; relied on them for plantation labor.
Patrick HenryVirginiaOwned enslaved people.
Benjamin FranklinPennsylvaniaOwned slaves early in life; later became an abolitionist and president of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society.
John AdamsMassachusettsDid not own slaves; opposed slavery personally, though tolerated its existence legally in early America.
Samuel AdamsMassachusettsDid not own slaves.
Alexander HamiltonNew YorkNot a slave owner; opposed slavery; active in founding New York Manumission Society.
John JayNew YorkOwned some slaves early, later freed them; supported gradual emancipation.
James MonroeVirginiaOwned enslaved people; maintained them while in public office.

Observations:

  • Most Southern Founding Fathers owned slaves, reflecting the economic dependence on plantation labor.
  • Many Northern Founding Fathers did not own slaves and some actively opposed slavery.
  • While slave ownership was common, direct involvement in the transatlantic slave trade was rare among them.

Timelines: A Pattern of Roughly 160, 250

  • Slavery in the English (later British) colonies in North America began in 1619, 157 years before independence of the United States.
  • The time slavery began in 1619 to when it was abolished in 1865 is 246 years.
  • The time the United States gained its independence to the current time in 2025 is 249 years.
  • The time slavery was abolished in 1865 to the current time in 2025 is 160 years.

Summary

  • Direct slave traders: 0 of the major Founding Fathers.
  • Slave owners: Roughly half of the 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence owned slaves at some point.
  • Abolitionists or non-slaveholders: Mostly from northern states, e.g., John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, Samuel Adams.

💡 Insight: The Founding Fathers were divided on slavery. Many Southern leaders were deeply tied to it economically, while Northern leaders often opposed it philosophically, setting the stage for long-term sectional tensions in the U.S.

V. England's John Newton: From Slave-Trader to Abolitionist

John Newton’s involvement in the slave trade is one of the most striking contrasts in his life story—because it shows just how powerful grace can be in reshaping a man.

Timeline of Newton’s Slave Trading Years

  • Early Naval Career (1743–1747): Newton served in the Royal Navy, then later worked with slave-trading ships on the West African coast.
  • 1748 – Conversion at Sea: In March 1748, Newton experienced a dramatic conversion during a violent storm off the coast of Ireland. He later described this as the beginning of his turning to God, though he admitted that his transformation was gradual, not immediate.
  • 1748–1754 – Slave Trader: Despite his conversion, Newton continued to work in the slave trade for about six years after that storm. He captained three voyages transporting enslaved Africans and invested financially in the trade.
  • 1754–1755 – Departure from Slave Trade: Newton suffered a serious stroke and never returned to sea. He later said this was part of God’s providence to pull him out of the trade.

Why He Stopped

  1. Health: His stroke in 1754 physically prevented him from continuing his maritime career.
  2. Growing Conviction: Though it took years for his conscience to fully awaken, Newton gradually became convinced that the slave trade was evil. His faith began to work deeper into his view of humanity and sin.
  3. Call to Ministry: By the late 1750s, Newton was studying for ministry. He was ordained in 1764 and became a parish priest in Olney, England. His pastoral heart increasingly clashed with the cruelty of slavery.

His Repentance and Public Opposition

  • He became a mentor to William Wilberforce, the Member of Parliament who led the movement to abolish the slave trade in Britain. Newton’s testimony gave moral and spiritual weight to the cause.
  • In 1807, the year Newton died, the British Parliament finally passed the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act.
For years Newton lived with deep regret. In 1788—more than three decades after leaving the trade—he published Thoughts Upon the Slave Trade, a pamphlet openly confessing his guilt:
“It will always be a subject of humiliating reflection to me, that I was once an active instrument in a business at which my heart now shudders.”

VI. Grace That Defines Us

In 1772, John Newton, the former slave trader turned preacher of grace, wrote these words:

“I am not what I ought to be, I am not what I want to be, I am not what I hope to be in another world; but still I am not what I once used to be, and by the grace of God I am what I am.”

A few years later, in 1776, Newton offered a simpler confession that distilled his faith into two profound realities:

I remember two things: that I am a great sinner, and that Christ is a great Savior.”

These two quotes, written only four years apart, reveal the heartbeat of Newton’s theology: honest humility paired with unshakable hope in Christ.


The Honest Confession

Newton’s words from 1772 remind us that the Christian life is not a finished product, but a journey. He admits his shortcomings with refreshing transparency—he is not yet what he longs to be. And yet, he also recognizes progress. Grace had changed him. The man who once trafficked in human lives now bore witness to God’s power to make all things new.

Newton understood what Paul meant when he wrote, “By the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain (1 Cor. 15:10).


The Simple Gospel

By 1776, Newton’s theology had been distilled even further. He could sum up all of Christian truth in two memories: his sin and Christ’s sufficiency.

It is a pairing that protects us from both pride and despair.

✝️ Remembering our sin keeps us humble;
✝️ remembering our Savior keeps us hopeful.

Grace for Today

We may feel the same tension Newton described: “I am not what I ought to be.” Our failures and flaws are real. But so is the grace of God that transforms. Like Newton, we can say:

  • I may not be finished, but I am no longer who I was.
  • I may still wrestle with weakness, but Christ is strong to save.
  • I may feel unworthy, but Christ is a great Savior.

This is the beauty of grace—it both humbles and lifts us up, reminding us that:

our identity rests not in what we have done, but in what Christ has done.

VII. Amazing Grace

John Newton’s “Amazing Grace” is one of the most famous hymns in history, but understanding its depth requires exploring his life, theology, and personal transformation.


1. Background: John Newton’s Life

  • Early Life and Career: Born 1725 in London, Newton went to sea as a young man and eventually became a slave trader. He experienced a brutal, often violent life at sea.
  • Conversion: Around 1748, during a violent storm at sea, he experienced a spiritual awakening. Newton began a slow journey of repentance and turning toward God.
  • Later Career: By 1764 he left the slave trade entirely when he became an Anglican minister, and eventually became an outspoken abolitionist, advocating against slavery in Britain.

Key point: Newton’s hymn is not just religious poetry—it’s a reflection of a lifetime of personal transformation, from moral blindness to spiritual sight.

2. Writing “Amazing Grace”

  • Date: Written in 1772 (first published in 1779 in Olney Hymns, co-authored with William Cowper).
  • Purpose: Written as a hymn for the congregation at Olney, England, to teach spiritual truth through song.
  • Theme: Grace as unearned, undeserved, and transformative. Newton uses his own life experience—his former sins and subsequent redemption—as a framework.

3. Key Themes in the Hymn

  1. Unmerited Grace
    • Newton repeatedly emphasizes that God’s grace is not earned by works, social status, or moral merit.
    • His personal past as a slave trader and sinner exemplifies the radical nature of grace.
  2. Transformation and Repentance
    • Lines like “I once was lost, but now am found” reflect the metanoia (turning of the heart) central to Newton’s theology.
    • Spiritual blindness and moral ignorance are replaced by understanding and obedience.
  3. Deliverance from Sin and Fear
    • The hymn speaks to deliverance from personal guilt, fear of death, and judgment, themes Newton knew intimately.
    • His survival of storms at sea became a metaphor for God’s preservation in life’s chaos.
  4. Hope Beyond Life
    • The final verse “when we’ve been there ten thousand years…” emphasizes eternal hope, reflecting Newton’s deep trust in God’s promises despite earthly sins.

4. Connection to Slavery

  • While written primarily as a spiritual reflection, “Amazing Grace” is inseparable from Newton’s personal involvement in slavery.
  • Some scholars argue that the hymn’s message of being “lost and found” mirrors Newton’s recognition of the moral blindness of the slave trade.
  • Later in life, Newton publicly opposed the trade, connecting the hymn’s spiritual redemption with social responsibility.

5. Enduring Significance

  1. Spiritual: A universal anthem of repentance, forgiveness, and hope.
  2. Historical: A hymn rooted in the contradictions of an 18th-century moral landscape, showing one man’s path from complicity in evil to active reform.
  3. Cultural: Became an anthem for abolitionists, civil rights activists, and anyone seeking redemption from personal or societal wrongs.

💡 Insight: Amazing Grace is more than a song of personal salvation—it’s a narrative of moral awakening, reflecting both the horrors Newton was part of and the hope of transformation that grace offers.


Its power lies in its honesty: it does not shy away from sin, but celebrates the possibility of redemption.

Amazing Grace
Amazing grace! how sweet the sound,
  That saved a wretch; like me!

I once was lost, but now am found,
  Was blind, but now I see.
’Twas grace that taught my heart to fear,
  And grace my fears relieved;

How precious did that grace appear
  The hour I first believed!
The Lord hath promised good to me,
  His word my hope secures;

He will my shield and portion be
  As long as life endures.
When we’ve been there ten thousand years,
  Bright shining as the sun,

We’ve no less days to sing God’s praise
  Than when we first begun.

Read more