🍞🧠✝️ Fasting: A Way to Set Your Minds on Things Above

Let’s explore fasting in the Ancient Near East (ANE) and Second Temple Period (STP) — emphasizing how it related not only to religious devotion but to social belonging, family identity, and communal participation.


I.🏺 1. Fasting in the Ancient Near East (ANE)

a. Broader Context

Across the ANE (including Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Canaan), fasting was a known practice, though not always in the same spiritual sense as in Israel.

  • Purpose: It was often associated with mourning, purification, or divine petition.
  • Cultural Parallels: Akkadian texts use terms like ṣēmu for fasting, often tied to ritual lamentation or seeking favor from a deity during crisis.
  • Royal and Civic Role: Fasting could be declared by rulers to avert national disaster or appease angry gods (e.g., similar to Jonah 3:5–7’s Nineveh narrative).

b. The Social Implication

Meals were central to ANE social order — binding kin, affirming alliances, and expressing divine favor.

  • Eating together meant covenantal peace; refusing food or drink meant estrangement or mourning.
  • Thus, fasting wasn’t only about the stomach — it was a social withdrawal, signaling that something was deeply wrong in the community or between humans and the divine.

c. Symbolic Dimension

In an honor–shame culture, where table fellowship signified relationship and blessing, fasting was a visible declaration of grief, guilt, or repentance.

  • To fast meant to “step outside” of the flow of communal life — one abstained from the table of man to seek the favor of God.
  • In a world where survival and joy were shared through meals, this was an act of spiritual protest or self-humbling.

🕎 2. Fasting in the Second Temple Period (STP)

a. Institutional and Communal Evolution

By the Second Temple era (5th c. BCE–1st c. CE), fasting had become a codified form of religious expression.

  • Public Fasts: National or community-wide fasts were held on days of remembrance (e.g., the destruction of the Temple, the exile).
  • Personal Fasts: Individuals fasted to express repentance (David in 2 Sam 12), grief, or to intensify prayer (Ezra 8:23, Daniel 9:3).

Pharisaic tradition normalized biweekly fasting (Luke 18:12) — Mondays and Thursdays — reflecting spiritual discipline but also status signaling within a pious community.

b. Table Fellowship as Identity

In the Second Temple world, shared meals marked group identity:

  • The Essenes (Dead Sea Scroll community) used ritual meals to define purity and membership — fasting, therefore, was temporary exclusion or self-exile from the sacred table.
  • Jesus’ ministry often reintroduced table fellowship as a sign of God’s inclusive kingdom (Luke 5:33–39). His refusal to require constant fasting shocked those whose religion was structured around ritual withdrawal rather than relational restoration.

Thus, in this context, to fast was to momentarily exit social joy — meals were microcosms of heaven’s order, and fasting was a reminder that one’s joy or covenantal peace had been broken.


🍞 3. The Familial and Relational Dimension

a. Eating as Belonging

In both ANE and Jewish thought, eating was not private — it was familial, covenantal, and communal. To share a meal was to share life and peace (shalom).

To abstain — especially voluntarily — was a way of saying, “I am not at peace. I await reconciliation.”

b. Fasting as Withdrawal

Voluntary fasting thus communicated:

  • Grief — “I cannot celebrate while in mourning.”
  • Repentance — “I step out of human fellowship to seek divine mercy.”
  • Intercession — “I will not enjoy the table until others can, too.”

Fasting broke routine rhythms of kinship meals, temporarily reversing Edenic abundance to face the brokenness of sin, exile, or injustice.

🌿 4. Theological Insight

  • Fasting and Presence: By stepping away from the communal table, the worshipper sought another — the divine table.
  • Absence for Presence: The absence of bread created space for the Bread of Life.
  • Relational Repair: The hope was always re-entry — that reconciliation with God would restore communion with others.

Jesus reframed this:

“When the bridegroom is taken away, then they will fast” (Matt 9:15).

His presence meant the restoration of table fellowship; fasting belonged to times of separation, not union.


🧠 Summary

AspectANESecond Temple Period
PurposeMourning, appeasement, purificationRepentance, prayer, identity, memorial
Social MeaningWithdrawal from fellowship, symbol of griefVoluntary exile from community joy
Meal SymbolismMeals = covenant and favorMeals = inclusion in God’s people
Fasting SymbolismAbsence = estrangementAbsence = longing for divine restoration

II. 🕊 1. Heavenly Orientation — Colossians 3:1–2

“Set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things.”

Paul begins with a dual call:

  • Heart (kardia): the seat of affection, desire, and will.
  • Mind (phroneo): the seat of perception, reasoning, and values.

Both must be recalibrated heavenward. This is not escapism — it’s alignment. The believer’s inner compass now points toward the resurrected Christ, not toward self, possessions, or passions.

✨ The Logic:

Because you have been raised with Christ, your identity no longer belongs to the lower order (the “earthly nature”), but to the heavenly. Thus, the Christian’s moral transformation flows not from effort alone but from union with a new realm — the Kingdom above.


⚰️ 2. Death to the Earthly Nature — Colossians 3:5–6

“Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature... Because of these, the wrath of God is coming.”

Here Paul identifies that what is “earthly” is not dirt or creation itself — God called creation good — but the fallen orientation of human desire and thought.

“Earthly” is shorthand for life detached from the rule of heaventhe mindset of autonomy, lust, greed, and idolatry (v. 5).

🔥 Wrath and Reality:

The wrath of God isn’t arbitrary rage; it’s the inevitable collision between heaven’s holiness and earth’s rebellion. Wherever humanity clings to the old nature, it remains under that wrath because it is oriented toward the very things that provoke it. The “earthly mind” lives in contradiction to the Creator’s order — and that contradiction self-destructs when exposed to divine light.


🧠 3. Mindset as Moral Axis — Matthew 16:23

“Get behind Me, Satan! You do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”

Jesus rebukes Peter not for malice but for misalignment. Peter loves Jesus yet reasons from below — imagining messiahship without suffering, glory without cross.

The phrase “you do not have in mind” (ou phroneis) echoes the Colossians call to “set your minds” (phroneite). The same root reveals the same battleground:

the mind’s orientation determines the soul’s allegiance.

To think “merely human concerns” is to operate within a moral logic detached from heaven’s values — self-preservation, comfort, reputation. To think “the concerns of God” is to be cross-shaped — to interpret reality through the lens of divine purpose, even when it means suffering for righteousness.


⚡ 4. Wrath Revealed — Romans 1:18

“The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness.”

Notice the phrase “from heaven.”

The same “above” where Christ reigns is the source from which both life and wrath are revealed. Heaven, the place of perfect order, harmony, and truth, reacts naturally against everything that suppresses truth and perpetuates chaos.

Paul’s language of “suppression” portrays humanity holding truth down — resisting revelation to preserve autonomy. This echoes Peter’s “human concerns” and the Colossians’ “earthly nature.”

The wrath isn’t so much God losing His temper as truth asserting itself — the light unmasking the darkness.


💡 5. Integration: The Anatomy of Wrath and Renewal

LayerHuman PostureDivine ResponseOutcome
Mindset (Matt. 16)Focused on self-preservation and human successRebuke — “You do not have in mind the concerns of God”Exposure of misalignment
Nature (Col. 3)Earthly, indulgent, self-centeredWrath “coming” against the earthly orientationCall to put it to death
World (Rom. 1)Suppressing truth, reordering reality without GodWrath “revealed from heaven”Consequences of godlessness

All three texts describe the same progression:

  1. Wrong mindset → 2. Corrupted nature → 3. Revealed wrath.
    And conversely, the gospel offers the reverse:
  2. Revealed Christ → 2. Renewed nature → 3. Transformed mind.

🌿 6. Spiritual Application: Fasting from the Earthly Mind

Returning to the study of fasting, this framework makes profound sense:

  • Fasting is not only abstaining from food but from the earth’s gravitational pull on the heart.
  • It is a temporary refusal to feed the earthly nature, a symbolic act of “putting to death” what belongs to the lower order.
  • It reorients the mind and affections toward things above, where Christ is.

In this light, fasting becomes a practical expression of Colossians 3:2 — not just denying the body, but training the soul to crave heaven.


✝️ 7. The Cross as the Divider of Mindsets

In all three passages, the Cross stands between heaven and earth:

  • In Matthew 16, Jesus demands Peter take up his cross — exchanging “human concerns” for divine purpose.
  • In Colossians 3, believers are said to have died and their life is hidden with Christ in God.
  • In Romans 1, the world that rejects this truth experiences wrath — while those who embrace it are justified by faith (Rom. 3:21–26).

The Cross, then, is both the place of wrath revealed and heaven opened — the turning point where the earthly mind can be crucified and the heavenly one reborn.


🌌 Summary Thought


The “wrath of God” is the friction between heaven’s truth and earth’s delusion.

The “mind set on things above” is not detached idealism, but alignment with the resurrected Christ — whose presence transforms wrath into renewal and death into life.

Read more