šŸŽšŸ‘€šŸ«“šŸš« The Pattern of Seeing and Taking That Jesus Breaks

I. 1. Eve in the Garden (Genesis 3:6)

  • Seeing: ā€œWhen the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyesā€¦ā€
  • Taking: ā€œā€¦she took of its fruit and ateā€¦ā€
  • Theme: The prototype of sinful desire—seeing leads to coveting and taking what is forbidden, resulting in catastrophic consequences for humanity.

2. The Sons of God and Human Wives (Genesis 6:2)

  • Seeing: ā€œThe sons of God saw that the daughters of man were attractive.ā€
  • Taking: ā€œā€¦and they took as their wives any they chose.ā€
  • Theme: Divine beings transgressing boundaries, leading to the Nephilim narrative and God’s judgment through the flood.

3. The Benjaminites and the Daughters of Shiloh (Judges 21:20-23)

  • Seeing & Taking: ā€œAnd when their fathers or their brothers come to complain to us, we will say to them, ā€˜Grant them graciously to usā€¦ā€™ā€ (context: the Benjaminites seize wives during a festival dance).
  • Theme: A desperate and violent resolution to Israel’s civil war consequences, reflecting social and moral disorder.

4. David and Bathsheba (2 Samuel 11:2-4)

  • Seeing: ā€œIt happened, late one afternoon, when David arose… that he saw from the roof a woman bathingā€¦ā€
  • Taking: ā€œSo David sent messengers and took herā€¦ā€
  • Theme: Abuse of kingly power; wrongful taking leads to a cascade of sin: adultery, deceit, murder, and divine judgment.

5. Amnon and Tamar (2 Samuel 13:1-14)

  • Seeing: ā€œAfter this Absalom the son of David had a lovely sister, whose name was Tamar; and Amnon the son of David loved her.ā€
  • Taking: He deceives her into his chamber and violates her.
  • Theme: Lust disguised as love. The perversion of desire into violence, echoing the Genesis 3 pattern but within David’s own house.

6. Achan and the Devoted Things (Joshua 7:20-21)

  • Seeing: ā€œWhen I saw among the spoil a beautiful cloak from Shinar, and 200 shekels of silverā€¦ā€
  • Taking: ā€œā€¦then I coveted them and took them.ā€
  • Theme: Covetousness leads to personal and communal judgment; mirrors Eve’s pattern of seeing, desiring, and taking what God forbade.

7. Potiphar’s Wife and Joseph (Genesis 39:7-12)

  • Seeing: While not explicitly using "saw," she persistently desires Joseph.
  • Taking (Attempted): She grabs Joseph's garment, attempting to force him into sin.
  • Theme: Inversion of gender roles in the "seeing and taking" pattern, with Joseph resisting, exemplifying righteousness.

8. Absalom’s Seizure of David’s Concubines (2 Samuel 16:21-22)

  • Seeing & Taking (Implied): Publicly takes his father’s concubines to assert power.
  • Theme: Political rebellion and personal revenge, reflecting prophetic judgment on David’s house (ā€œYou took Uriah’s wife, now others will take yoursā€).

9. Solomon’s Many Foreign Wives (1 Kings 11:1-3)

  • Seeing & Taking (Implied): ā€œNow King Solomon loved many foreign womenā€¦ā€ leading to idolatry.
  • Theme: Despite his wisdom, Solomon’s unrestrained desires lead to covenantal unfaithfulness and the kingdom’s division.

10. The Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:3-4)

  • Seeing & Taking (Implied in building): Desire to "make a name for ourselves" through collective pride.
  • Theme: Corporate human ambition to seize divine status; a communal echo of Eden’s temptation.

Thematic Pattern:

ActionSeeingDesiringTakingJudgment
Eve✦ Eyes opened to what was ā€œgoodā€Desire for wisdomTook forbidden fruitExile from Eden
Sons of GodSaw human beautyDesired forbidden unionsTook wivesFlood judgment
DavidSaw BathshebaDesired herTook herChild dies; family chaos
AmnonSaw TamarLust disguised as loveViolated herMurdered by Absalom
AchanSaw spoilCovetedTook banned itemsDeath; Israel’s defeat
SolomonSaw foreign womenDesired alliancesTook many wivesKingdom divided

Reflection:

This motif of ā€œseeing and takingā€ reveals a core biblical anthropology: distorted desire turns sight into sin when God's boundaries are transgressed. Yet in contrast, figures like Joseph show how resisting the urge to ā€œtakeā€ preserves righteousness.


Matthew 4:1-11 (the temptation of Jesus) is the climactic reversal of the "see and take" pattern from Genesis onward. Let’s explore how this passage stands in deliberate contrast to the earlier biblical narratives where ā€œseeingā€ led to wrongful ā€œtaking.ā€


II. ✦ 1. Judas Iscariot & The Thirty Pieces of Silver (Matthew 26:14-16; 27:3-5)

  • Seeing & Desiring: Judas, disillusioned or greedy, conspires to betray Jesus for financial gain. The Gospels hint at his ongoing covetousness (John 12:6).
  • Taking: ā€œWhat will you give me if I deliver him over to you?ā€ They paid him thirty silver coins.
  • Outcome: Betrayal of innocent blood, deep remorse, tragic death.
  • Pattern Echo: Like Eve, Judas ā€œseesā€ an opportunity for self-advancement but at the cost of faithfulness. His taking mirrors Achan’s covetous greed and David’s abuse of proximity and power.

✦ 2. Ananias & Sapphira (Acts 5:1-11)

  • Seeing & Desiring: They sell property but secretly withhold part of the proceeds, seeking the honor of sacrificial generosity without the actual sacrifice.
  • Taking (Keeping Back): ā€œBut Ananias, with his wife Sapphira, sold a piece of property, and kept back for himself some of the proceedsā€¦ā€
  • Outcome: Immediate divine judgment—death.
  • Pattern Echo: Like Achan, they see and covet what they want while pretending obedience. Their ā€œtakingā€ is deceptive, blending false worship with greed.

✦ 3. Simon the Sorcerer (Acts 8:18-23)

  • Seeing & Desiring: ā€œWhen Simon saw that the Spirit was given through the laying on of the apostles' handsā€¦ā€
  • Attempted Taking: ā€œā€¦he offered them money, saying, ā€˜Give me this power also.ā€™ā€
  • Outcome: Rebuked by Peter for his ā€œgall of bitterness and bond of iniquity.ā€
  • Pattern Echo: Desire to seize spiritual power through worldly means, echoing Babel’s self-exaltation and Satan’s temptation to take kingship without submission.

✦ 4. The Rich Young Ruler (Mark 10:17-27)

  • Seeing & Desiring: Desires eternal life but is unwilling to ā€œlet goā€ of his possessions.
  • Taking (Refusing to Release): Though not explicitly ā€œtaking,ā€ his clinging to wealth is the inverse of taking—he ā€œkeepsā€ instead of following Jesus.
  • Outcome: Goes away sorrowful, unable to embrace the kingdom's upside-down values.
  • Pattern Echo: His possessions ā€œownā€ him, much like Achan and Solomon, who valued earthly riches over covenant faithfulness.

✦ 5. Herod Antipas & John the Baptist's Execution (Mark 6:17-28)

  • Seeing & Desiring (Indirect): Herodias’ daughter dances, pleasing Herod’s eyes.
  • Taking (By Demand): Herodias uses the opportunity to demand John’s head.
  • Outcome: A wrongful ā€œtakingā€ of life driven by pride and political fear.
  • Pattern Echo: A tragic blend of lust, power, and manipulation, similar to David’s abuse of Bathsheba and the Benjaminites at Shiloh.

✦ Jesus as the Counter-Pattern:

Biblical FiguresSee & Take for ThemselvesJesus
Eve, Judas, Achan, AnaniasDesire to ā€œtakeā€ wisdom, money, power, statusJesus refuses to take bread, kingdoms, or glory apart from the Father
Babel, Simon MagusSeize divine status/power for selfJesus empties Himself, humbling to the point of death
Rich Ruler, SolomonCling to riches, self-sufficiencyJesus becomes poor for our sake, trusts fully in God’s provision

✦ Philippians 2:6-11: The Anti-Seize Christ

  • ā€œThough He was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped [seized]ā€¦ā€
  • Contrast: Unlike Adam, Eve, and the tower-builders, Jesus does not grasp at divine status but empties Himself, taking the form of a servant.
  • Outcome: God highly exalts Him—true exaltation comes through obedience, not seizing.

✦ The Pattern Redeemed in the Church:

  • Early believers are called to see rightly (spiritual sight), to desire God's will, and to take up the cross (Mark 8:34), not to grasp power or wealth for self.
  • True taking is receiving from God, not seizing for self (John 1:12: "to all who received Him... He gave the right to become children of God").

III. ✦ The Temptation of Jesus (Matthew 4:1-11)

Context: After His baptism, Jesus is led into the wilderness by the Spirit to be tested, echoing Israel’s testing and Adam’s temptation.

TemptationSatan ShowsInvitation to TakeJesus’ ResponseContrast to Adam, Israel, David
Stones to bread (v. 3-4)Stones representing physical needā€œCommand these stones to become loaves of breadā€ā€œMan shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of Godā€Adam took the fruit to satisfy desire; Jesus refuses to take apart from God’s provision.
Pinnacle of the temple (v. 5-7)Jerusalem, the temple, public spectacleā€œThrow yourself downā€ (force God’s hand)ā€œYou shall not put the Lord your God to the testā€Israel tested God in the wilderness; Jesus refuses to manipulate God for personal glory.
All the kingdoms of the world (v. 8-10)Shown ā€œall the kingdoms… and their gloryā€ā€œFall down and worship meā€ (shortcut to power)ā€œYou shall worship the Lord your God and Him only shall you serveā€Eve saw and took to ā€œbe like Godā€; Jesus refuses to grasp what is already His by right.

✦ Key Observations:

  • ā€œShowed Him all the kingdomsā€ (v. 8): A direct visual temptation—Satan appeals to sight, just as with Eve ("saw that it was good").
  • Invitation to Take Without Obedience: Each temptation offers a way to ā€œtakeā€ prematurely, apart from the Father’s will.
  • Jesus’ Response: Anchored in Scripture (Deuteronomy), reversing the pattern of desire-driven taking. He embodies living ā€œby every wordā€ from God.

✦ Biblical Pattern Comparison:

PatternGenesis 3 (Eve)David & BathshebaJesus in the Wilderness
SeeingSaw the tree was goodSaw Bathsheba bathingShown all the kingdoms
DesiringDesired wisdom, beautyDesired BathshebaTempted to desire power, provision, glory
Taking (or Refusing to Take)Took and ateTook herRefuses to take—chooses obedience
OutcomeFall of humanityFamily and kingdom turmoilVictory over temptation, Sonship affirmed

✦ Theological Significance:

  • Jesus as the True Son: Where Adam, Israel, David, and even Solomon failed, Jesus succeeds. He sees but does not seize.
  • Kingdom by Suffering, not Seizing: Jesus rejects shortcuts to kingship (unlike Babel or the sons of God in Genesis 6). He embraces the path of humility, obedience, and the cross.
  • Living by God’s Word: Contrasts the lie of self-sufficiency (Eve, Achan, David) with the reality that true life is in trusting God’s provision and timing.

✦ Application: The Redeemed Pattern

  • From ā€œSee & Takeā€ to ā€œSee & Trustā€: Jesus models a redeemed human response—seeing with spiritual discernment, desiring God’s will, and taking only what the Father gives.
  • Victory Over the Old Pattern: This moment is a pivotal undoing of the fall’s pattern, inaugurating a new way of being human in Christ.

Read more

šŸœļøšŸŒµā›ˆļøāœļøāœØšŸŒ± The Wilderness Test: Complaining Versus Training

I.šŸŖž Two Lenses: Same Situation, Different Meaning 1. Now-Centric Complaining ā›ˆļø Core posture: ā€œThis shouldn’t be happening.ā€ This mindset is present-anchored but purpose-blind. It evaluates everything based on immediate comfort, fairness, or preference. Characteristics: * Short time horizon → only sees now * Emotion-driven interpretation → ā€œthis feels bad = this is badā€ * Assumes disruption

By Ari Umble
šŸ’”āœØšŸŖžāœļøā¤ļø God is Love: How His Power is Made Perfect in Weakness [3 parts]

šŸ’”āœØšŸŖžāœļøā¤ļø God is Love: How His Power is Made Perfect in Weakness [3 parts]

I. 1. ā€œGod is Loveā€ - What Kind of Love? ā¤ļø When Scripture says ā€œGod is loveā€ (1 John 4:8), the word used is agapē (ἀγάπη). This is not: * eros (desire-based love), * philia (mutual affection), …but agapē—a self-giving, other-oriented, costly love. It has a few defining characteristics: * It initiates

By Ari Umble